Wednesday 16 October 2013

What can a comparative analysis of bio pics Walk The Line and Gia reveal about cinematic representations of women?



aim 1:
aim 2:
aim 3

What can a comparative analysis of Biopics Walk the line and Gia reveal about cinematic representations of women?

For this investigation I will be looking at two biopics that explore contrasting ways women are represented in my chosen texts. I will be applying Mulvey's theory of the 'Male Gaze', looking at the objectification and purity shown through the individual female characters paying particular attention to how they are both represented, differently but the same. The first film I will be looking at is based on the life of Johnny Cash, the period of time where male dominated roles of society started deteriorating after the end of World War 2; looking at close reference to the way the women were portrayed purely as objects and how their roles get transferred and transfused with the male's position and responsibilities how they became the figure of what women are to this day looking at close reference to how the world war changed that. [1]
 The second text I'll be looking at is a film called 'Gia' which is based on the life of popular model, Gia Allemend. The biopic portrays her animal characteristics and the rebellious behavior she introduced wide audiences to, portraying a counter stereotype of the female presence than the usual womanly characteristics from earlier 1900's. [2] Both women are shown differently throughout the two texts, but still consist of being objectified throughout the scenes. I will be comparing selected scenes and backing them up with deep analysis and exploration.


Aim 2: How are women presented differently through and from patriarchal societies?
Looking at my first text ‘Walk The Line’ the main role of J.R's wife is to be a mother, remaining at home looking after the property and doing housework as most women in the 1960's were expected to be doing. Prior to World War 2 lots of women were becoming more powerful from acquiring the male jobs whilst they were away, adapting and escaping their subordinate roles to be more than just a housewife. [3] The devalued society of women in the early 60’s was soon rendered with the first wave of feminism. Subjects against the political discussion said that a woman could either be a career woman or she could stay at home and have children. There was no way she could do both” [3] The role of Johnny’s wife conforms to the primary research through her archetype status, looking after the children whilst her husband takes on the business career. Introducing the role of June Carter, (a performing artist Johnny meets and falls in love with) her position contrasts with his wife’s career as an artist and her ability to travel around freely and unconditional. The two women show the roles of a mother and a woman with a career, the significant subordinate differences they are open to and the way they both conform to needing men even though the role of June is a much stronger character and defies to not needing Johnny throughout the film. From point of view tracking shots and close ups we begin to see June being opened up to the audience, she is rarely shown as being weak and her character isn’t exposed but the interaction with Johnny corrupts her and she begins to lack in concealment, she starts to become vulnerable and the camera focuses on her emotion and interactions with others, allowing the audience to allow her story and character as passive. One scene shows June Carter conforming to Johnny where he convinces her to come on his tour by bribing her with money for her children’s well being. The close up details and rigid hand held camera work makes the audience feel more involved with the characters. The desperation that Johnny prevails alongside close up camera shots of his eyes focused on June, the camera swapping to her from J.R’s level looking down on her. (TWO READINGS WORD?) This scene shows the two different readings of the passive audiences, conforming to their preferred characters. These kind of interactions engage and inform audiences on the lives of higher status people, previewing us with something that the ‘fans’ don’t usually see. This inside story creates a shared meaning for us as an audience enabling us to relate and feel empathy for June, from the way the male reacts and is strongly besotted with her.


-scene where Johnny asks her to stay on tour, convinces her? Conforms to him, sings and goes on tour
manages to turn her mind set into him.

Aim 3: How are women placed in stereotypical gender roles?
There are two prominent stereotypes of women in my first text, Johnny’s wife Vivian was left whilst her lover sends the cash she needs to live; thus showing the dependency house wives had on the male figure, making his role seem like a necessity.  Looking at the scene where Johnny phones Viv whilst she’s at home with the crying children, the camera uses close up shots and camera angles that overlook her body, showing the fragile position she’s in, capturing and streaming the point where she looks most vulnerable. The scene focusing on the incapability that she possesses, showing the audience that she has a lack of control without the male figure around. This scene allows the audience to make their own interpretations highlighting the build-up of emotions and vulnerability she’s in instead of showing the other 9/10 of her living where she is more capable.
June was first introduced to J.R when he listened to her on the radio as a young boy. His low status and love her music enabled him to look up to her as a role model with the high class and power she possessed at such a young age. This social difference shows the controversy of the change in representations from childhood to becoming a man. The preponderance of her position remained until J.R then grew up and became Cash and the authority and ‘power’ conveyed over to him. This is shown when June supports his headline act. [1]


Aim 2:  Different forms of female representation
throughout the text/Opposing forms of representation?
Looking at the second text the main character is Gia Allemend, the female protagonist. Her position has a variety of representations, the main one being her ability to be outgoing and using her sexuality to her advantage, the empowering character has the ability to control men with her appearance; in the resource ‘Miss Representation’ it says
The Male Media represents females in power trivially’ [4] The scene that she’s is presented this way is when a male enters a cafe she is working at and her she uses her ability to seductively control his actions and make him entranced by her with her language and looks. Her body language towards the male as she swings her legs and body of the bar to sit in front of him, holding his eye contact using the camera enhance tension in the scene by using close ups and using high camera positioned shots, looking down on the male from the counter to show her control over the situation. The scene also includes a two shot where the camera shows a mid length position and presents the two opposing characters face to face, this could involve Strauss’ theory exploring the binary opposition between the innocence and power; the male being shown as the innocence and Gia as the opposition, influencing and succumbing him to fulfill her desire. Gia’s characters is extremely objectified, applying Laura Mulvey’s theory of the male gaze that will engage the audience, making the extremity of her character turn passive with the familiarization of sexual behavior. Allemend’s character has unusual masculine qualities, her ability to overpower the male whilst still being objectified as such shows something different that's not usually expected and will corrupt the audience’s recognition and intrigue them more so, appealing to the male gaze.


[1] Walk The Line

[2] GIA

 [3] http://www.archives.gov/atlanta/education/resources-by-state/wwii-women.html

[4] Miss Representation – 2011


‘the socially constructed nature of sexual difference’ - (Harrison Ford) in Mike Nichols’ Working Girl (1988)

genre formulae-
challenge prevailing ideologies?

The usefulness of having predicted elements is that a communication will be understood because they’re expected (or conventional) in which people anticipate in certain situatuations or context.
Rhetorical sensitivity – it is a way of thinking about what should be said and then deciding a way to say it / how



(Unofficial not finished)



Notes~
-Mulvey theory
-Rebellion
-Cultivation theory (how people are influenced from them)
-Place and a time
‘it could be argued’
-messages are shaped – constructed?

No comments:

Post a Comment